Jose suffered a broken shoulder, ankle, and a laceration to his abdomen. He was a passenger. Sadly, Jose’s driver, Luque, and the front seat passenger died in the crash.
Defendant’s big rig argued that Luque was intoxicated while driving. Luque crossed the centerline and caused the head-on collision. The other car that was hit were victims—not perpetrators.
Jose argued that Luque was working for Del Mar Food and driving their big rig. Del Mar stated that Luque was commuting home while driving Jose as his passenger. Del Mar argued that Luque was not working for them at the time.
Jose is a fault-free passenger. But he could not blame the other car in the head-on collision, because his driver was drunk and caused the accident. Jose tried to go after his driver’s employer.
But Del Mar was protected - Jose was not actually working, but going home. Under the doctrine of the going-and-coming rule, they were immune.
To settle the case, Del Mar offered $30,000 to end litigation. Jose’s injuries are easily worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.
PRO TIPS
- Many lawyers assume that when a big rig is involved, there’s over $1M in insurance. Not always true. If the at-fault driver is merely going home, the owner is usually immune.
Jose v. Luque et al
Santa Cruz Superior Court | May 8, 2024
|